Impending collapse

At the middle of the 13th Century BCE the major civilizations of the Mediterranean and of Mesopotamia were thriving. There were well established trade routes that extended from Afghanistan to Mycenae. The leaders of the major cultures regularly exchanged gifts, and married the daughters of other leaders. There was an interconnected web of relationships that served to keep conflict to a minimum.

But at about the turn of the century most of the major civilizations of the region collapsed. The Egyptians blamed the destruction on invaders who arrived by boat on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean whom they called the “Sea Peoples.” And yes, there were invading forces who ravaged many of the cities that were destroyed. We have a written eyewitness account from the city of Ugarit that describes the arrival of marauders by sea who killed the city’s residents and burned the entire city.

And yet, not all of the destruction of this era was caused by humans. Some cities were destroyed by earthquakes. It also appears that climate change had produced a long drought. Perhaps the marauding invaders were really just refugees from calamities that happened further west.

This is still a subject of active research– even after more than a century of archaeological investigations. But the emerging picture seems to be of a number of separate catastrophes that resulted in a perfect storm of disruption– a crash that is now known as the Bronze Age Collapse.

Today we are confronted with a global climate change that is driven by the human use of fossil fuels. It is like a 10,000 mile long freight train that is moving at half a mile an hour. It’s advance is slow, but when it hits it will demolish everything in its path.

There are estimated to be more than 400 million people living in regions that are less than 10 feet above sea level. As sea levels rise, those people will be forced to move. They will become refugees– a modern version of the Sea Peoples.

But the climate change we are experiencing won’t just result in sea level rise. It will also make much of the planet too hot for farming, too hot for work, too hot for recreation. It will increase the likelihood of devastating storms. And it will increase the numbers and sizes of fires.

One of the worst consequences of the Syrian Civil War that began in 2011 was the displacement of several million Syrian refugees. They were not well received. In fact many people in Europe and the United States felt threatened by the influx of foreigners. But the impending refugee crisis that will be caused by rising sea levels will be a hundred times worse– and the resulting fear and resentment will likely be ruinous.

Another problem that has recently emerged is that of Artificial Intelligence. While its boosters are promising a bold new future of massive productivity gains, there is the distinct possibility that AI could displace more jobs than it creates. In fact Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei said that AI could displace entry level jobs and create a permanent underclass of the underemployed and unemployed.

It seems as if we are confronted with a perfect storm of calamities that threaten to cause a global collapse– very similar to what brought the Bronze Age to a devastating demise.

And yet something else is happening. There is a major energy revolution going on all around the world. Pakistan now produces more than half its electrical energy from renewables. Spain is at about 55%. Portugal is over 75%. California is now over 62%. And Texas– the world capital of “Drill baby, drill!!” is at about one third. Cities all over the world are revising zoning laws to allow apartment dwellers to install solar panels on their balconies. There is a massive, worldwide rush to adopt renewable energy solutions, despite the efforts of business and government leaders who are heavily invested in market doctrines of the past.

And why is this happening? It’s because the costs of renewables are now lower than the costs of coal and gas in most markets. More than 100 coal fired power plants were permanently closed during Trump’s FIRST term of office– because those plants were just too expensive to operate. The logic of the market is the chief instrument that is destroying the fossil fuel market.

Just think about it. Suppose you have an oil well in northern Alaska. You’re pumping out product like mad– but most of your customers probably don’t reside in Alaska. So you’re going to have to ship your product to your customers. But before you can do that, you’re going to have to ship it to a refinery to be turned into products– like heating oil and gasoline– that your customers can use. So you have to pay for shipping once to the refinery, then you have to pay for the refining process, then you have to pay to ship it a second time from the refinery to your customer.

Now imagine that your brother has a wind farm in Montana. He’s got a one time expense of installing his windmills, and another one time cost of connecting them to the electrical grid. But after that, his maintenance costs are minimal. In the long run renewables are just cheaper to operate.

Even with renewable energy sources the world must still confront a huge installed base of fossil fuel powered automobiles, trucks, trains, and planes. But EV sales are rapidly increasing in some parts of the world as the Iran war drives oil prices higher.

And there is another major movement happening. People are rebelling against oligarchs. Victor Orban was booted out of office despite having almost total control over the Hungarian government. Donald Trump’s second term launched a coup against the U.S. constitutional order based on the battle plan spelled out in the Project 2025 handbook. And now, one and a half years later, Trump’s economy is veering toward stagflation, his tariffs are a flop, his war of choice in Iran has resulted in a stalemate, and his brazen corruption has revolted all but the most committed MAGA loyalists. In Russia, Vladimir Putin is losing the war he launched against Ukraine in February of 2024. The Russian people are experiencing fuel shortages, and the Russian economy is faltering. Putin’s regime is teetering.

These problems– climate change and the faltering of oligarchy in Russia and the United States– are directly related. When Trump abducted President Maduro of Venezuela he was very clear that he expected the United States to simply take Venezuela’s oil. “To the victor go the spoils,” he said. The current kerfuffle over a Texas company’s alleged rights to oil exploration in Greenland are clearly part of a ploy to grab as much of Greenland’s oil as possible. The GOP is largely funded by the fossil fuel industry, so it has every reason to defend the old economic order. And it has shown every commitment to continue doing so.

Just imagine what world politics would be like if fossil fuels were not a major factor in the global economy. The shutting down of the Strait of Hormuz wouldn’t be a problem. Climate change would be slowing, or stopping, or perhaps even reversing. The urge to grab another country’s oil resources wouldn’t be a factor in global politics. And the influence of countries that have relied chiefly on oil revenues would begin to decline. It would be a very different world.

As for the adverse effects of Artificial Intelligence, public outrage is building around the world over the construction of massive data centers. They are slurping up water– at a time when drought is affecting much of the world’s population. They are consuming huge amounts of electricity. And many of them are being built with their own power plants using… fossil fuels.

The public is also alarmed at the threat to jobs that Artificial Intelligence poses. AI apologists claim that AI will create at least as many jobs as it destroys. Yes, the construction phase of a new data center will create new construction jobs over the short term. But once a data center has been created it will require very few staff to operate it. In fact most of the monitoring of a fully built out data center can be done remotely.

And we can see clear evidence from the stock market as to what business leaders think about AI. The market has been going up at a time of increasing inflation and falling employment. Why? It’s because CEOs have been told that the wonders of AI will allow them to cut costs by replacing many of their workers with AI agents. They view AI as a cheap way to realize short term profit gains.

The public is beginning to catch on to this bit of legerdemain. Did anyone ever VOTE on the idea of replacing human workers with AI agents? NO! And people the world over are now beginning to realize what the AI stakes really are.

Civilization has collapsed before, and it can collapse again. We have many threats, but this time is fundamentally different from the time of the Bronze Age. People have more awareness of what is happening. Yes, climate change moves slowly. But people are experiencing it directly now. The Aral Sea has been shrinking for decades. Lake Mead is at its lowest level ever. Water shortages have forced Washington State to restrict surface water usage in its eastern half. Fire and hurricane seasons are longer, and the damage they do is much greater than it was a few decades ago. People around the world know that climate change is real, regardless of how many times Trump claims it is all just a Chinese hoax.

And this particular form of climate change is something that humans can actually do something about. We can reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. And not only can we do that, but doing so will actually be cheaper in the long run! That is something that just wasn’t true of Bronze Age climate change.

The AI frenzy is very much like the Dot Com bubble. That was a bubble built purely on hype– and it crashed the world economy. This bubble will likely do the same, for the simple reason that the technology companies pushing AI have yet to find an AI product that masses of users actually want. It seems very likely that this bubble is about to burst.

Wealthy and powerful persons are doing everything they can to push the world toward oligarchical control. Russel Vought has declared that we are in a “post-constitutional” era. The seeming glee with which the GOP has supported all of Trump’s fascist policies is clear evidence that they fully approve of Project 2025.

And yet the American public– indeed, the global public– is resisting fascism. And the world economy is rapidly shifting away from fossil fuels, despite the best efforts of the ultra rich to preserve the present order.

This is the battle of our time. It’s a battle on three major interdependent fronts: climate change, oligarchy, and Artificial Intelligence. We can look back to the Bronze Age to see what levels of destruction are possible. But each of these fronts in the present battle are amenable to human resistance. And the resistance is building.

Copyright (c) 2026 by David S. Moore

All rights reserved

Benchmarking AI

How can we know if Artificial Intelligence systems are truly intelligent? There’s only one way: benchmark testing.

We need a system of tests that can be run against any software agent purporting to implement Artificial Intelligence. These tests should span a broad array of activities which humans normally think of as requiring intelligence, and they should return results that can be meaningfully graded.

The responses from multiple AI systems should be strongly similar. For example, if one AI system diagnosed a set of medical symptoms as indicating cancer, and another diagnosed them as indicating hematoma, that would indicate that the two systems have implemented very different deductive engines, at least as regards medical diagnosis.

The benchmark tests should cover a range of levels of difficulty, from simple to impossible. Mathematical tests might range from arithmetic problems to proving that the Riemann Hypothesis is either true or false.

Different realms of intelligent behavior produce different types of output that can’t all be judged in the same manner. A request to find the prime factors of 15 should always return 5 and 3. But a request to produce a sonnet about spring could have many suitable answers, some lovely and some lousy.

Here’s an outline of the type of benchmark test that I think would be useful:

Basic Level

Solve some elementary mathematical problems in {arithmetic or algebra or calculus or …}

Write a {Sonnet or Haiku or Villanelle or …} about {spring or a waterfall or the death of a relative or …}

Describe {electromagnetic induction or the Cavendish experiment or the double slit experiment or …} in language that a person with an eighth grade education can understand

Describe the chief causes of the American Civil War, listed in descending order of significance

Design a {storage shed or planter box or writing desk or …} with specifications {list of specifications}

Intermediate

Diagnose medical condition {condition} with the following symptoms: {list of symptoms}

Solve the field equations of {General Relativity or Maxwell’s Equations or Quantum Mechanics or …} for the following specific problem: {problem specification}

Describe the origins, history, and impacts of {the Renaissance or the Mongol conquests or the Great Depression or …}

Write an orchestral concerto for {violin or piano or clarinet or …} in {two or three or four or …} movements in the key of {musical key}

Design a house with specifications {list of specifications} in accordance with the regulations of {governing body}

Scan the laws of {governing body} for the following specific issues: {logical contradictions, passive voice, obsolete wording, conflicts with the laws of {governing body}, etc.}

Difficult

Prove a well known but difficult to prove mathematical theorem, like the Four Color Map theorem

Identify the chief similarities in politics and military strategy of the {American Civil War or Napoleonic Wars or Russian Revolution or …} and compare with those of the {French Revolution or Chinese Revolution or Peloponnesian War or …}

Design a skyscraper with specifications {list of specifications} in accordance with the regulations of {governing body}

Design a medical treatment for medical condition {condition for which no treatment currently exists} and a means for measuring its efficacy

Impossible

Prove either that the Riemann Hypothesis is true or that it is false

Describe the nature of dark matter and how it can be detected in an actual experiment

Predict the market value of all equities in the {NYSE or NASDAQ or AMEX or …} in {6 or 12 or 18 or …} months

Determine the most effective and lowest cost way to ensure the health, welfare, happiness, and security of all the peoples of the world

Grading the test

If every test item can be graded, then the results of the entire test can be assigned a grade. At a minimum any system purporting to be a true implementation of Artificial Intelligence should be able to perform at least as well as a single human expert on any specific question.

Some questions can be graded as either right or wrong, such as solutions of mathematical problems. But some will require some manner of judgment. The quality of a work of music or literature will require a judgment of artistic worth. So rules of grading must be established to determine how such grading will be implemented.

These benchmark tests should be run against every major AI bot at least yearly, and the results should be published for all to see. One would hope that those AI bots that perform poorly would gradually fall out of favor.

And it may even be possible that over time some of the tests grouped under the “Impossible” heading might actually move into “Difficult.” Now that would be a sign of true intelligence.

Copyright (c) 2026, David S. Moore

All rights reserved.

The Perils of Artificial Intelligence

The Good

In 1942 Alan Turing designed a machine known as “The Bombe” that enabled the British to break the German Enigma code.

Dendral, a computer program developed in the 1960s, is considered the world’s first expert system– a program that employs domain knowledge to solve a specific real world problem. The purpose of Dendral was to help organic chemists identify the most likely shapes of molecules based on their mass spectrometer data.

In 1976 two mathematicians at the University of Illinois announced that a computer program they had written had proved the validity of the Four Color Map theorem. That was the first time that a major mathematical theorem was first proved by a computer program, rather than by a person.

In 2002 the floor cleaning robot Roomba was released to market, enabling families the world over to delegate the unpleasant tasks of vacuuming and mopping to an automated tool.

In 2014 Amazon introduced Alexa, an automated DJ, news and information provider, and general conversationalist.

In July 2022 the company DeepMind announced that its artificially intelligent program AlphaFold had found the solution to folding 200 million proteins.

These are all manifestly good things. Artificial Intelligence may soon be able to help humans solve problems that humans have been unable to solve. That could lead to innumerable benefits to human society: new products that improve health; methods for reducing pollution; improved safety for transportation, medical treatments, and building design. For each of these problems we should welcome the efforts of computer scientists to extend our knowledge and bring more real world problems into the domain of the solvable. Artificial Intelligence is a tool, one of extraordinary power and flexibility. We should use it, just as our forebears chose to use steamshovels to replace human labor.

The Bad

But there is a dark side to Artificial Intelligence. For one thing, it has the potential to replace whole classes of workers whose jobs were not previously threatened. When steamshovels replaced human labor in coal mining operations, the cost of coal production was lowered. The end result was that the cost of energy was greatly reduced, enabling a broad range of consumers to spend money on other goods and services. The mining workers who were displaced would probably have left mining altogether– but with increased consumer spending throughout the economy, new jobs would materialize in a broad range of alternative industries.

That would be less true of, say, gold mining operations. Gold is a luxury good and a global security blanket. A dramatic lowering of the price of gold isn’t going to result in massive changes to consumer buying habits, and hence it would result in far less job creation.

Human welders were replaced on many assembly lines by automated welding machines– particularly in the automobile industry. That resulted in better welds, fewer industrial accidents, and lower costs. But it also resulted in the relatively high paying union jobs of the automotive industry being replaced with jobs in the “service” industry. And what are services? Doctors, dentists, lawyers, and architects all provide services. But so do waiters and waitresses, retail clerks, and sales representatives. Overall the trend in the United States has been that higher paying jobs in manufacturing were replaced with lower paying jobs in services– particularly in retail and hospitality.

In the present day world AI has the potential to eliminate jobs across a much broader swath of businesses. Consider, for example, Accounts Receivable (AR). Those customers who owe money to a company for services previously rendered are tracked in AR. The AR clerk’s responsibility is to resolve invoicing disputes, and to help the company reduce outstanding indebtedness to the company by contacting debtors to demand payment. Conceivably AI could replace an AR clerk’s responsibilities with an effectiveness comparable to that of a human. Doing so would reduce the company’s costs, but what kinds of jobs would replace that of the AR clerk? If the experience in manufacturing is any guide, the AR clerk will likely wind up waiting tables. And if all clerks in Payroll, Human Resources, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable have been replaced with AI, the manager of the entire accounting department will eventually be out of a job as well. Is that truly a benefit to society?

What other types of jobs could AI replace? Well, potentially any job that requires expert knowledge could be replaced by computer software. Business analysis, medical diagnosis, engineering design, legal consulting– all such specialized skills could be susceptible to enhancement or replacement by Artificial Intelligence. In fact it is even conceivable that software engineering itself could be done better and more efficiently by… AI.

Whose jobs are truly safe from automation? Can a chef be replaced? Only if someone invents a robot that can chop vegetables, roll out dough, and grill steak as well as a Cordon Bleu chef. But given the advances that have been made in robotics in the past 50 years, it just might happen in the next 50.

Nobody really knows how many jobs will ultimately be lost to AI. One could imagine a world in which almost all jobs have been automated. It is therefore not too early to think about such an eventuality.

The Ugly

And we can be certain that Artificial Intelligence will be used by charlatans to produce fake essays, fake documentation, and fake personal profiles. Nefarious actors will use it to scam unsuspecting people out of their life savings. It will be used by fraudsters to deceive the public and subvert the rule of law. It will be used as a weapon by those who have no love for their fellow human beings and who seek only their own personal enrichment and aggrandizement.

Constraints

We want a future in which people feel content and rewarded for their contributions to society. A world in which the vast majority of people are working in low wage service sector jobs doesn’t sound like the kind of society we want. So let us now define some constraints under which AI must operate to ensure that we don’t lose ourselves to an overly automated future. Here are some suggested constraints:

  • The use of Artificial Intelligence for fraudulent or deceitful purposes must be made a criminal offense. No one should be allowed to hide behind the defense that it was the machine that broke the law, not the person who employed Artificial Intelligence to illegal purposes.
  • Artificial Intelligence should be made available to law enforcement at low or no cost to help with the detection of fraud– particularly that perpetrated by the use of Artificial Intelligence.
  • The use of Artificial Intelligence must not result in massive increase of the working poor who have no hope of affording higher education for their children, of saving for retirement, or of tending to loved ones who need personal care.
  • The use of Artificial Intelligence must not significantly increase the numbers of indolent ignoramuses. We want people to be engaged in society and to feel that their contributions are valued. If all of the difficult and complex tasks in the world have been tackled by Artificial Intelligence, what challenges will be left to humans?
  • Artificial Intelligence may be used to recommend options for social and governmental policy, but all final policy decisions must remain securely in the hands of human beings.
  • Similarly, Artificial Intelligence may be used to identify criminal suspects, but it must never be used to determine guilt or innocence. That must always remain within the purview of human beings, however fallible they might be.
  • Above all, Artificial Intelligence should be regarded as a tool to improve human life and society and must always be subservient to human needs.

Problems

The world has made tremendous strides in reducing slavery and poverty and unemployment. But slavery still exists, abject poverty still exists, and more than a billion people in the world do not have gainful employment. Artificial Intelligence may very well be able to help address such problems. Consequently we should now demand that Artificial Intelligence be directed to helping solve society’s most intransigent problems. Let us put Artificial Intelligence to use by giving it problems to solve that will actually benefit all of us and lead us jointly to the type of future in which we all want to live. Here are some examples of the types of problems that AI should address:

  • How can we best increase employment, health, and welfare across the entire planet?
  • How can we reduce or eliminate the risk that climate change will degrade or destroy human civilization?
  • How can we redesign social media systems so that they reward collegiality and problem resolution, rather than fear and rage?
  • How can we build a society that minimizes alienation, addiction, and isolation while encouraging engagement and positive contributions?
  • How can we best protect Earth from the hazard of cosmic collision by asteroids or comets?
  • How can we minimize violent crime and terrorism around the planet?
  • How can we improve our legal systems to make them harmonious across local, state, and federal boundaries?
  • How can we improve our health care systems to increase longevity and to improve the overall quality of life across all echelons of society?
  • How can we improve education so that everyone on the planet has the ability to reach their maximum potential?

The major providers of Artificial Intelligence services should be required to devote a significant portion of their time and resources to addressing these and other such problems. Society cannot afford to allow such a powerful tool to be applied only to those problems that are most likely to provide the greatest short term return on investment. The above problems are all very long term problems whose solutions would undoubtedly return immense rewards to society, but they are also problems that do not lend themselves to a short term profit driven business model.

Conclusion

Artificial Intelligence is a dramatic new technology that will undoubtedly change society and the future of our planet. Whether it becomes a net benefit to society, or instead brings about the degradation of human civilization will depend entirely on how it is used. We must decide how and for what it will be used. Now is the time to set boundaries, to define long term goals, and to demand that the power of this new technology be used to address the problems of greatest urgency to us all. Programs that can beat the best human chess players, or go players, or Jeopardy champions have their interest. But the problems facing world society and civilization are much more pressing. We need to ensure that Artificial Intelligence will make a positive contribution, and won’t be used exclusively to enrich business investors.

Copyright (c) 2023, David S. Moore.

All rights reserved.